Tagged with rural

Foxhunting still being debated

“After 13 years of discussing and debating this issue I found it impossible to ignore the truth and facts about hunting. I have come to despise the League Against Cruel Sports, even though I was its Chairman and Chief Executive, simply because these people know as well as I do that the abolition of hunting will not make any difference to the welfare of foxes, hares or deer.”

Richard Course
Former Chairman and Executive Director of the League Against Cruel Sports for thirteen years. Commenting in April 1998.

Continue reading

Tagged , ,

Join the BARD

If you’ve heard about the eco-town development planned for Long Marston (the developers want you to call it ‘Middle Quinton’ but trust me, it isn’t!), and are feeling dismayed don’t be alone. Not only have Stratford District Council come out against the proposal, but there is also now a campaign supported by the Campaign to Protect Rural England, and the likes of John Nettles and Dame Judy Dench.

So join the Better Accessible Responsible Development campaign and don’t let Stratford be swamped by yet more new homes without proper transportation or amenities.

www.bardcampaign.com

Tagged , , ,

Go down the pub!

Apparently village pubs are in crisis with nearly four closing a day due to the lowest beer sales since the Great Depression of the 1930s and spiralling running costs, it has been claimed.

Read the full story in the Telegraph here…

…then get down the pub and support your local, and your local community.

Tagged ,

Eco-workhouse

I’m on a rant, so bear with me…

Hazel Blears, the Communities Secretary, said that The Prince of Wales’ development Poundbury in Dorset owed more to “self-aggrandisement” than a concern for the residents who live there. Drawing comparisons between it and towns such as Bournville in Birmingham, constructed by factory owners to house workers locally.

Can she explain where HRH’s one village is different from the 15 proposed eco-towns being foisted upon communities by the government? Aside from the obvious one, people want to live in Poundbury.

When the eco-towns are forced into existing communities, bringing in huge numbers of people [allegedly 6,000 to 15,000 homes, so potentially 30,000 people) with insufficient facilities (nearest Accident & Emergency unit more than 10 miles away, nearest Police Station with 24hr staff and cells more than 10 miles away, nearest high school 3 miles away) [Yes, I'm talking about Middle Quinton, again...] and then forces them to surrender their cars by creating new traffic laws (forced 15mph speed limits) does she think this will be any better?

Poundbury had to meet local planning laws, and be approved by local residents. Middle Quinton can be forced onto a former military base and local protest counts for nothing. If the government, through Hazel Blears, must make pretentious and idiotic comments could they at least stick to something reasonable… maybe explaining why building new homes on a former military site (with rumours of ground contamination from munitions) makes more sense than retro-fitting existing homes in low income areas to be more environmentally sound. I remember driving through the deserted base housing estates of Lower Quinton shortly after the base shut, wondering why these perfectly good homes were allowed to fall into ruin when so many people in the area needed affordable housing.

The proposed eco-town looks like the kind of political planning that lead to the building of Milton Keynes. A modern day workhouse where every aspect of your life has been planned by a government approved urban designer who has just learned to draw with the wax crayons rather than eating them…

Hazel, shut it until you can think of something sensible to say.

Okay, I feel better now!

Tagged , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.